linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56228B85.9040309@ahsoftware.de>
Date:	Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:55:17 +0200
From:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] init: deps: IDs for annotated initcalls

Am 17.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:14:23PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
>> These patch contains the IDs for initcalls I've annotated.
>>
>> This patch is NOT meant for merging into mainline in its current form.
>>
>> It should be discussed about how to add these IDs and in which form, if
>> the feature ends up in mainline at all.
>>
>> E.g. it could make sense to split this file into several files in order
>> to avoid merge conflicts.
>>
>> It also might make sense to prefill this file with IDs for many drivers.
>>
>> E.g. the following script will use a modules.dep file to produce IDs for
>> modules. It's meant to be used on a very complete modules.dep build through
>> make allmodconfig && make -jN modules && make modules_install.
>
> A file like this is going to be a nightmare to maintain and ensure that
> it actually is correct, I don't see it as a viable solution, sorry.

How often will drivers be added? The only changes on this file will 
happen if a driver will be added and then just one ID will be added.

As said above, the file could be filled with IDs for all existing 
modules, regardless if they are already annotated.

If that's a nightmare, I wonder what how you name the necessary stuff to 
maintain the link order through Makefiles.

But besides that, I'm totally open to any other idea how to identify a 
driver. For me, just using an enum looks like the most trivial way.

Alexander Holler

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/