[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5625A86D.6050102@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:35:25 +0800
From: xiakaixu <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <acme@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
<jolsa@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pi3orama@....com>,
<hekuang@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/1] bpf: control events stored in PERF_EVENT_ARRAY
maps trace data output when perf sampling
δΊ 2015/10/20 10:14, Alexei Starovoitov ει:
> On 10/19/15 3:37 AM, Kaixu Xia wrote:
>> +/* flags for PERF_EVENT_ARRAY maps*/
>> +enum {
>> + BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_CUR = 0,
>> + BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_ALL = 1,
>> + __NR_BPF_EVENT_CTL_BITS,
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define BPF_CTL_BIT_FLAG_MASK \
>> + ((1ULL << __NR_BPF_EVENT_CTL_BITS) - 1)
>> +#define BPF_CTL_BIT_DUMP_CUR \
>> + (1ULL << BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_CUR)
>> +#define BPF_CTL_BIT_DUMP_ALL \
>> + (1ULL << BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_ALL)
>> +
>
> the above shouldn't be part of uapi header. It can stay in bpf_trace.c
> Just document these bits next to helper similar to skb_store_bytes()
>
> The rest looks ok.
> It still needs an ack from Peter for perf_event bits
Thanks for your comments!
This part will be moved to bpf_trace.c in next version.
>
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists