[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5625A36D.8070200@plumgrid.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:14:05 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: wangnan0@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pi3orama@....com, hekuang@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/1] bpf: control events stored in PERF_EVENT_ARRAY
maps trace data output when perf sampling
On 10/19/15 3:37 AM, Kaixu Xia wrote:
> +/* flags for PERF_EVENT_ARRAY maps*/
> +enum {
> + BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_CUR = 0,
> + BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_ALL = 1,
> + __NR_BPF_EVENT_CTL_BITS,
> +};
> +
> +#define BPF_CTL_BIT_FLAG_MASK \
> + ((1ULL << __NR_BPF_EVENT_CTL_BITS) - 1)
> +#define BPF_CTL_BIT_DUMP_CUR \
> + (1ULL << BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_CUR)
> +#define BPF_CTL_BIT_DUMP_ALL \
> + (1ULL << BPF_EVENT_CTL_BIT_ALL)
> +
the above shouldn't be part of uapi header. It can stay in bpf_trace.c
Just document these bits next to helper similar to skb_store_bytes()
The rest looks ok.
It still needs an ack from Peter for perf_event bits
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists