[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151021105442.GM6948@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:54:42 -0400
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
dhowells@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
David.Woodhouse@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] xfrm: Fix unaligned access in
xfrm_notify_sa() for DELSA
On (10/21/15 08:57), Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> > @@ -2659,7 +2659,7 @@ static int xfrm_notify_sa(struct xfrm_state *x, const struct km_event *c)
> > if (attr == NULL)
> > goto out_free_skb;
> >
> > - p = nla_data(attr);
> > + p = PTR_ALIGN(nla_data(attr), __alignof__(*p));
>
> Hm, this breaks userspace notifications on 64-bit systems.
> Userspace expects this to be aligned to 4, with your patch
> it is aligned to 8 on 64-bit.
>
> Without your patch I get the correct notification when deleting a SA:
>
But __alignof__(*p) is 8 on sparc, and without the patch I get
all types of unaligned access. So what do you suggest as the fix?
(and openswan/pluto dont flag any errors with the patch, which is
a separate bug).
--Sowmini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists