linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: Support %ps/%pS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:26:43 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools lib traceevent: Support %ps/%pS

Em Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:07:29PM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> 
> This fell through the abyss of my INBOX.
> 
> Arnaldo, can you take this.

Sure
 
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:16:37 -0500
> Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com> wrote:
> 
> > Commits such as 65dd297ac25565 ("xfs: %pF is only for function
> > pointers") caused a regression because pretty_print() didn't support
> > %ps/%pS.  The current %pf/%pF implementation in pretty_print() is what
> > %ps/%pS is supposed to do, so use the same code for %ps/%pS.
> > 
> > Addressing the incorrect %pf/%pF implementation is beyond the scope of
> > this patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > index cc25f05..f05e5b0 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > @@ -4761,8 +4761,8 @@ static void pretty_print(struct trace_seq *s, void *data, int size, struct event
> >  				else
> >  					ls = 2;
> >  
> > -				if (*(ptr+1) == 'F' ||
> > -				    *(ptr+1) == 'f') {
> > +				if (*(ptr+1) == 'F' || *(ptr+1) == 'f' ||
> > +				    *(ptr+1) == 'S' || *(ptr+1) == 's') {
> >  					ptr++;
> >  					show_func = *ptr;
> >  				} else if (*(ptr+1) == 'M' || *(ptr+1) == 'm') {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/