linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/11] net: ipv4: hlen could be set as size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151023.065111.918009116932115995.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 06:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	clabbe.montjoie@...il.com
Cc:	jmorris@...ei.org, kaber@...sh.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] net: ipv4: hlen could be set as size_t

From: LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:21:00 +0200

> I have added all mailing list given by get_maintainer but this was done per patch with --to-cmd/--cc-cmd
> Does it is better to put all mailing list globally ?
> 
> For the (0/N) mail, I forgot to add a subject on it https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/23/219
> 
> I will fix all minor finding and resend a proper version.

Ask yourself the question: who will apply my patch series and to what tree will
they apply it.

If you cannot answer that question, you probably need to more properly split
up your patches into several patch series, one for each intended maintainer
and their respective tree.

It is impossible to review some subset of a patch series, if the whole series
isn't also available to read for the purposes of context.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/