linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.1 00/46] 4.1.12-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <562A99F0.70208@osg.samsung.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:34:56 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1 00/46] 4.1.12-stable review

On 10/23/2015 11:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.12 release.
> There are 46 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun Oct 25 17:46:11 UTC 2015.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.1.12-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

I am seeing the following compile error (was seen in 4.2.4-rc1)

In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0,
                 from include/linux/stddef.h:4,
                 from ./include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4,
                 from include/uapi/linux/types.h:13,
                 from include/linux/types.h:5,
                 from include/uapi/linux/capability.h:16,
                 from include/linux/capability.h:15,
                 from include/linux/sched.h:15,
                 from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12:
drivers/xen/preempt.c: In function ‘xen_maybe_preempt_hcall’:
drivers/xen/preempt.c:34:11: error: too few arguments to function
‘should_resched’
        && should_resched())) {
           ^
include/linux/compiler.h:164:42: note: in definition of macro ‘unlikely’
 # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
                                          ^
In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:18:0,
                 from include/linux/spinlock.h:50,
                 from include/linux/seqlock.h:35,
                 from include/linux/time.h:5,
                 from include/uapi/linux/timex.h:56,
                 from include/linux/timex.h:56,
                 from include/linux/sched.h:19,
                 from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12:
./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:93:29: note: declared here
 static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
                             ^
scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target 'drivers/xen/preempt.o' failed
make[2]: *** [drivers/xen/preempt.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
scripts/Makefile.build:403: recipe for target 'drivers/xen' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/xen] Error 2
Makefile:947: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
make: *** [drivers] Error 2

thanks,
-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/