[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151023232136.GA13904@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:21:36 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Backlund <backlund.thomas@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1 39/46] sched/preempt: Fix cond_resched_lock() and
cond_resched_softirq()
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:14:30PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> Den 23.10.2015 kl. 20:46, skrev Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> >4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> >------------------
> >
> >From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
> >
> >commit fe32d3cd5e8eb0f82e459763374aa80797023403 upstream.
>
> This one broke drivers/xen/ build
>
>
> drivers/xen/preempt.c: In function ”xen_maybe_preempt_hcall”:
> drivers/xen/preempt.c:34:11: error: too few arguments to function
> ”should_resched”
> && should_resched())) {
> ^
>
>
> Needed fix is:
>
> From 0fa2f5cb2b0ecd8d56baa51f35f09aab234eb0bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:52:01 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] sched/preempt, xen: Use need_resched() instead of
> should_resched()
Thanks, now queued up.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists