[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1445989051.2757.65.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:37:31 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Don't fallback to git by default
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 00:25 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Another option would be to add another pattern to the
> > I2C section that matches all subdirectories of drivers/i2c/:
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index fb7d2e4..c670e1f 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -5104,6 +5104,7 @@ S: Maintained
> > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/
> > F: Documentation/i2c/
> > F: drivers/i2c/
> > +F: drivers/i2c/*/
>
> Hmm, what would be the drawback of extending the meaning of
> 'drivers/i2c/' to include 'drivers/i2c/*/'? To be honest, I assumed it
> works this way already and I'd think I am not alone with that
> assumption.
Some top level directories contain other subsystems.
A maintainer of something like arch/arm doesn't generally
want to be the maintainer of arch/arm/mach-<foo>
You _want_ a wider number of reviewers for patches to any
of those unmaintained subsystems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists