linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Don't fallback to git by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151028000535.GC1572@katana>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2015 01:05:35 +0100
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Don't fallback to git by default

> Some top level directories contain other subsystems.
> 
> A maintainer of something like arch/arm doesn't generally
> want to be the maintainer of arch/arm/mach-<foo>
> 
> You _want_ a wider number of reviewers for patches to any
> of those unmaintained subsystems.

I agree.

+F:	drivers/i2c/*/

makes sense then.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)