linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 8/8] PCI: ACPI: Add support for PCI device DMA coherency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151027144805.GD8660@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:48:05 -0500
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc:	bhelgaas@...gle.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
	catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	hanjun.guo@...aro.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 8/8] PCI: ACPI: Add support for PCI device DMA
 coherency

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 08:52:11AM -0700, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> This patch adds support for setting up PCI device DMA coherency from
> ACPI _CCA object that should normally be specified in the DSDT node
> of its PCI host bridge.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> CC: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/probe.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 09264f8..6e9f7e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1642,17 +1642,26 @@ static void pci_set_msi_domain(struct pci_dev *dev)
>   * @dev: ptr to pci_dev struct of the PCI device
>   *
>   * Function to update PCI devices's DMA configuration using the same
> - * info from the OF node of host bridge's parent (if any).
> + * info from the OF node or ACPI node of host bridge's parent (if any).
>   */
>  static void pci_dma_configure(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	struct device *bridge = pci_get_host_bridge_device(dev);
>  
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->dev.of_node) {
> -		if (!bridge->parent)
> -			return;
> -
> -		of_dma_configure(&dev->dev, bridge->parent->of_node);
> +		if (bridge->parent)
> +			of_dma_configure(&dev->dev,
> +					 bridge->parent->of_node);

This fixes the leak I mentioned earlier, since we now put the bridge
device before returning.  But I guess I'd still prefer to see the leak
fix as a patch by itself instead of fixing it incidentally here.

> +	} else if (has_acpi_companion(bridge)) {
> +		struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_node(bridge->fwnode);
> +		enum dev_dma_attr attr = acpi_get_dma_attr(adev);
> +
> +		if (attr != DEV_DMA_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> +			arch_setup_dma_ops(&dev->dev, 0, 0, NULL,
> +					   attr == DEV_DMA_COHERENT);
> +		else
> +			WARN(1, FW_BUG "PCI device %s fail to setup DMA.\n",
> +			     pci_name(dev));

This should use dev_warn() so the format is the same as for other
messages related to "dev".

Personally, I would write this as:

  if (attr == DEV_DMA_NOT_SUPPORTED)
    dev_warn(&dev->dev, "DMA not supported\n");
  else
    arch_setup_dma_ops(...);

to avoid the double negative in the conditional.

>  	}
>  
>  	pci_put_host_bridge_device(bridge);
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/