[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151028093907.GP4931@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:39:07 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, wsa@...-dreams.de,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
broonie@...nel.org, ben-linux@...ff.org,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> > You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion.
> > That's not the case at all. All it does is better describe the (very
> > worthy) function you *actually* provide.
>
> It is getting into dispute about entire change of yours... which is not
> what I want. I agree with your general idea but I was referring only to
> that particular case - the Samsung PMICs (and Maxim PMICs/MUICs which
> would fall into same category).
Not being affected by this change, I wonder what the technical
difference is if someone is listed as reviewer instead of maintainer.
Does get_maintainer.pl behave differently?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists