[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMu38xKcwOccuToPGf1L1uc9s7F7_SzUi6+F2noeqMWgzsjrOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:18:45 -0200
From: Albino B Neto <bino@...o.us>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/file.c: __const_max is actually __const_min :-)
2015-10-29 9:01 GMT-02:00 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>:
> 7f4b36f9bb930 "get rid of files_defer_init()" inexplicably changed a
> min() to a __const_max() - but the __const_max macro actually gives
> the minimum... So no functional change, just less confusing naming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> ---
> fs/file.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index 6c672ad329e9..b2d74f6001eb 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -25,9 +25,9 @@
>
> int sysctl_nr_open __read_mostly = 1024*1024;
> int sysctl_nr_open_min = BITS_PER_LONG;
> -/* our max() is unusable in constant expressions ;-/ */
> -#define __const_max(x, y) ((x) < (y) ? (x) : (y))
> -int sysctl_nr_open_max = __const_max(INT_MAX, ~(size_t)0/sizeof(void *)) &
> +/* our min() is unusable in constant expressions ;-/ */
> +#define __const_min(x, y) ((x) < (y) ? (x) : (y))
> +int sysctl_nr_open_max = __const_min(INT_MAX, ~(size_t)0/sizeof(void *)) &
> -BITS_PER_LONG;
>
> static void *alloc_fdmem(size_t size)
Confused code or no ?
Albino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists