linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 22/22] of/platform: Defer probes of registered devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1446134778.701.374.camel@freescale.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:06:18 -0500
From:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
CC:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"Hu Mingkai-B21284" <Mingkai.Hu@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 22/22] of/platform: Defer probes of registered devices

On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 15:40 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 22 October 2015 at 23:27, Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 15:04 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > > On 22 October 2015 at 00:51, Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 08:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Scott Wood <
> > > > > scottwood@...escale.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 16:03 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > > > > > > Instead of trying to match and probe platform and AMBA devices 
> > > > > > > right
> > > > > > > after each is registered, delay their probes until
> > > > > > > device_initcall_sync.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This means that devices will start probing once all built-in 
> > > > > > > drivers
> > > > > > > have registered, and after all platform and AMBA devices from 
> > > > > > > the DT
> > > > > > > have been registered already.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This allows us to prevent deferred probes by probing 
> > > > > > > dependencies on
> > > > > > > demand.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Changes in v4:
> > > > > > > - Also defer probes of AMBA devices registered from the DT as 
> > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > >   also request resources.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  drivers/of/platform.c | 11 ++++++++---
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This breaks arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c.  The PCI bus is an OF
> > > > > > platform
> > > > > > device, and it must be probed before pcibios_init() which is a
> > > > > > subsys_initcall(), or else the PCI bus never gets scanned.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks for the report. This is probably getting dropped, but it 
> > > > > could
> > > > > be disabled for PPC.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think that adding another arbitrary arch difference would be 
> > > > the
> > > > right solution.
> > > 
> > > I think Rob meant temporarily disable it while things get fixed. At
> > > least,
> > 
> > So, what is the permanent fix for the swiotlb issue (or more generally, 
> > the
> > inability to have a late_initcall that runs after non-module, non-hotplug
> > platform devices have been probed)?
> 
> If the code in pcibios_init() depends on the PCI bus device having
> probed, then I would recommend making that dependency explicit by
> calling of_device_probe() on the OF node of the PCI controller when
> looking it up.

"when looking it up"?  pcibios_init() doesn't do anything with the OF node or 
know any details about the particular PCI bus host implementation.

> > > I don't see any reason why PPC wouldn't benefit from this
> > > series.
> > 
> > It's not clear to me what the benefit of this is at all, much less for 
> > PPC.
> > What is the fundamental problem with deferred probes?  In the cover letter
> > you say this change saves 2.3 seconds, but where is that time being 
> > consumed?
> >  Are the drivers taking too long in their probe function trying to 
> > initialize
> > and then deferring, rather than checking for dependencies up front?  Or 
> > are
> > there really so many devices and such a pessimal ordering that most of the
> > time is spent iterating through and reordering the list, with each defer
> > happening quickly?
> 
> The problem is that a device that defers its probe is currently sent
> to the back of the queue, and that's undesired in some use cases in
> which there's a device that should be up as soon as possible during
> boot (and boot takes a long time). So the goal is to change the order
> in which devices with dependencies end up probing.

That doesn't answer my question about where the time is being spent.  Did you 
profile?

-Scott


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/