[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <133510f34e89a9be81766bea3c7ddc1605198ee6.1446086230.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:08:38 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH V4] cpufreq: governor: Quit work-handlers early if governor is stopped
gov_queue_work() acquires cpufreq_governor_lock to allow
cpufreq_governor_stop() to drain delayed work items possibly scheduled
on CPUs that share the policy with a CPU being taken offline.
However, the same goal may be achieved in a more straightforward way if
the policy pointer in the struct cpu_dbs_info matching the policy CPU is
reset upfront by cpufreq_governor_stop() under the timer_mutex belonging
to it and checked against NULL, under the same lock, at the beginning of
dbs_timer().
In that case every instance of dbs_timer() run for a struct cpu_dbs_info
sharing the policy pointer in question after cpufreq_governor_stop() has
started will notice that that pointer is NULL and bail out immediately
without queuing up any new work items. In turn, gov_cancel_work()
called by cpufreq_governor_stop() before destroying timer_mutex will
wait for all of the delayed work items currently running on the CPUs
sharing the policy to drop the mutex, so it may be destroyed safely.
Make cpufreq_governor_stop() and dbs_timer() work as described and
modify gov_queue_work() so it does not acquire cpufreq_governor_lock any
more.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
@Rafael: Please apply this patch alone for now, let me work out with the
timer/work thing first before applying other patches.
V3->V4:
- Updated changelog as suggested by Rafael.
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 11258c4c1b17..b260576ddb12 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -171,10 +171,6 @@ void gov_queue_work(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
int i;
- mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
- if (!policy->governor_enabled)
- goto out_unlock;
-
if (!all_cpus) {
/*
* Use raw_smp_processor_id() to avoid preemptible warnings.
@@ -188,9 +184,6 @@ void gov_queue_work(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus)
__gov_queue_work(i, dbs_data, delay);
}
-
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gov_queue_work);
@@ -229,13 +222,24 @@ static void dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = container_of(work, struct cpu_dbs_info,
dwork.work);
struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared = cdbs->shared;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = shared->policy;
- struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+ struct dbs_data *dbs_data;
unsigned int sampling_rate, delay;
bool modify_all = true;
mutex_lock(&shared->timer_mutex);
+ policy = shared->policy;
+
+ /*
+ * Governor might already be disabled and there is no point continuing
+ * with the work-handler.
+ */
+ if (!policy)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
+
if (dbs_data->cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
@@ -252,6 +256,7 @@ static void dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
delay = dbs_data->cdata->gov_dbs_timer(cdbs, dbs_data, modify_all);
gov_queue_work(dbs_data, policy, delay, modify_all);
+unlock:
mutex_unlock(&shared->timer_mutex);
}
@@ -478,9 +483,17 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (!shared || !shared->policy)
return -EBUSY;
+ /*
+ * Work-handler must see this updated, as it should not proceed any
+ * further after governor is disabled. And so timer_mutex is taken while
+ * updating this value.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&shared->timer_mutex);
+ shared->policy = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&shared->timer_mutex);
+
gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
- shared->policy = NULL;
mutex_destroy(&shared->timer_mutex);
return 0;
}
--
2.6.2.198.g614a2ac
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists