[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10826143.ebnrY1EVJN@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 23:41:36 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] cpufreq: governor: Quit work-handlers early if governor is stopped
On Thursday, October 29, 2015 08:08:38 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> gov_queue_work() acquires cpufreq_governor_lock to allow
> cpufreq_governor_stop() to drain delayed work items possibly scheduled
> on CPUs that share the policy with a CPU being taken offline.
>
> However, the same goal may be achieved in a more straightforward way if
> the policy pointer in the struct cpu_dbs_info matching the policy CPU is
> reset upfront by cpufreq_governor_stop() under the timer_mutex belonging
> to it and checked against NULL, under the same lock, at the beginning of
> dbs_timer().
>
> In that case every instance of dbs_timer() run for a struct cpu_dbs_info
> sharing the policy pointer in question after cpufreq_governor_stop() has
> started will notice that that pointer is NULL and bail out immediately
> without queuing up any new work items. In turn, gov_cancel_work()
> called by cpufreq_governor_stop() before destroying timer_mutex will
> wait for all of the delayed work items currently running on the CPUs
> sharing the policy to drop the mutex, so it may be destroyed safely.
>
> Make cpufreq_governor_stop() and dbs_timer() work as described and
> modify gov_queue_work() so it does not acquire cpufreq_governor_lock any
> more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Applied, thanks!
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists