linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Rename MFD and regulator names differently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151030122437.GT4058@x1>
Date:	Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:24:37 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc:	broonie@...nel.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Rename MFD and regulator names
 differently

On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Alim Akhtar wrote:

> Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic,
> and this MFD also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which
> has the same name, which is a bit confusing.
> 
> We did discussed different approaches about how the MFD and it
> cells need to be named here [1].
> Based in the discussion this patch rename MFD regulator name as
> *-regulator instead of current *-pmic.
> 
> [1]-> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/28/417
> 
> Suggested-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/sec-core.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

You need to squash these patches together, or you will hurt
bisectability for your platform.
  
But the code looks good:
  Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> index 7c4e7be17f1e..c9802ba9be72 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s5m8767_devs[] = {
>  
>  static const struct mfd_cell s2mps11_devs[] = {
>  	{
> -		.name = "s2mps11-pmic",
> +		.name = "s2mps11-regulator",
>  	}, {
>  		.name = "s2mps14-rtc",
>  	}, {
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps11_devs[] = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct mfd_cell s2mps13_devs[] = {
> -	{ .name = "s2mps13-pmic", },
> +	{ .name = "s2mps13-regulator", },
>  	{ .name = "s2mps13-rtc", },
>  	{
>  		.name = "s2mps13-clk",
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mps13_devs[] = {
>  
>  static const struct mfd_cell s2mps14_devs[] = {
>  	{
> -		.name = "s2mps14-pmic",
> +		.name = "s2mps14-regulator",
>  	}, {
>  		.name = "s2mps14-rtc",
>  	}, {
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = {
>  
>  static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = {
>  	{
> -		.name = "s2mpu02-pmic",
> +		.name = "s2mpu02-regulator",
>  	},
>  };
>  

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/