[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151031024034.GX28319@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 11:40:34 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Functional dependencies between devices
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 03:13:09AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, October 29, 2015 09:15:09 AM Mark Brown wrote:
> > This seems like a good plan to me however I am concerned that only
> > allowing links to be created at device registration time will prove
> > restrictive - it means we're going to ignore anything we figure out
> > later on in the boot sequence.
> That's not the plan, though. :-)
> I'm talking about device registration time or device probe time (for
> dependencies that aren't known at the registration time).
Oh, so I think allowing things to be added at probe time addresses my
concerns - for some reason I'd parsed your mail as talking about
registration time only.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists