[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201510311143.BIH87000.tOSVFHOFJMLFOQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 11:43:00 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: cl@...ux.com
Cc: htejun@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] vmstat: Create our own workqueue
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > Wait, this series doesn't include Tetsuo's change. Of course it won't
> > fix the deadlock problem. What's necessary is Tetsuo's patch +
> > WQ_MEM_RECLAIM.
>
> This series is only dealing with vmstat changes. Do I get an ack here?
>
Then, you need to update below description (or drop it) because
patch 3/3 alone will not guarantee that the counters are up to date.
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Seems that vmstat needs its own workqueue now since the general
> workqueue mechanism has been *enhanced* which means that the
> vmstat_updates cannot run reliably but are being blocked by
> work requests doing memory allocation. Which causes vmstat
> to be unable to keep the counters up to date.
I am waiting for decision from candidates listed at
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201510251952.CEF04109.OSOtLFHFVFJMQO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp .
If your series is not for backporting, please choose one from
the candidates. Can you accept the original patch at
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201510212126.JIF90648.HOOFJVFQLMStOF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
which implements (1) from the candidates?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists