[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151102024313.6198dc83@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:43:13 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>,
Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@....fr>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the
file-locks tree
Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
fs/9p/vfs_file.c
between commit:
4f6563677ae8 ("Move locks API users to locks_lock_inode_wait()")
from the file-locks tree and commit:
4c3932157148 ("9p: do not overwrite return code when locking fails")
from the akpm-current tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
(no action is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/9p/vfs_file.c
index f23fd86697ea,6b747394f6f5..000000000000
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
@@@ -231,7 -231,8 +231,8 @@@ out_unlock
if (res < 0 && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
fl_type = fl->fl_type;
fl->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
- res = locks_lock_file_wait(filp, fl);
+ /* Even if this fails we want to return the remote error */
- posix_lock_file_wait(filp, fl);
++ locks_lock_file_wait(filp, fl);
fl->fl_type = fl_type;
}
out:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists