linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151102025125.0f335513@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:51:25 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block
 tree

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  block/blk-mq.c

between commit:

  3ef28e83ab15 ("block: generic request_queue reference counting")

from the block tree and commit:

  7cc8e61bde7a ("mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd")
  415a13cc1c3c ("mm, page_alloc: rename __GFP_WAIT to __GFP_RECLAIM")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (the code updated in the latter was moved by the former,
so I applied the following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:49:02 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] block: fixes for __GPF_WAIT changes

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
 block/blk-core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 9e32f0868e36..6f2c263f478b 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ int blk_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, gfp_t gfp)
 		if (percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter))
 			return 0;
 
-		if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
+		if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
 			return -EBUSY;
 
 		ret = wait_event_interruptible(q->mq_freeze_wq,
@@ -2038,7 +2038,7 @@ void generic_make_request(struct bio *bio)
 	do {
 		struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev);
 
-		if (likely(blk_queue_enter(q, __GFP_WAIT) == 0)) {
+		if (likely(blk_queue_enter(q, __GFP_RECLAIM) == 0)) {
 
 			q->make_request_fn(q, bio);
 
-- 
2.6.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/