[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1446430907-25955-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 13:21:47 +1100
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH kernel] rcu: Fix comment for rcu_dereference_raw_notrace
rcu_dereference_raw() calls indirectly rcu_read_lock_held() while
rcu_dereference_raw_notrace() does not so fix the comment about the latter.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 581abf8..931d627 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
* The tracing infrastructure traces RCU (we want that), but unfortunately
* some of the RCU checks causes tracing to lock up the system.
*
- * The tracing version of rcu_dereference_raw() must not call
+ * The no-tracing version of rcu_dereference_raw() must not call
* rcu_read_lock_held().
*/
#define rcu_dereference_raw_notrace(p) __rcu_dereference_check((p), 1, __rcu)
--
2.5.0.rc3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists