[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151102145923.GB24667@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:59:23 +0100
From: Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: merge kvm_arch_set_irq with
kvm_set_msi_inatomic
2015-11-02 13:21+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> We do not want to do too much work in atomic context, in particular
> not walking all the VCPUs of the virtual machine. So we want
> to distinguish the architecture-specific injection function for irqfd
> from kvm_set_msi. Since it's still empty, reuse the newly added
> kvm_arch_set_irq and rename it to kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic.
kvm/queue uses kvm_arch_set_irq since b7184313f4b9 ("kvm/x86: Hyper-V
synthetic interrupt controller").
Is synic going to be dropped before this patch is merged?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists