[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1511032055570.22567@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 20:57:24 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, jeyu@...hat.com,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: old_name.number scheme in livepatch sysfs
directory
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Also I would omit the suffix at all when it is the first occurrence. It
> will cause that unique symbols will not be numbered.
That'd mean that the names (including suffixes) are not stable, because a
particular name that has originally been unique can later be made
non-unique when module brings in a conflicting name.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists