[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151104161006.GB29899@treble.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 10:10:06 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
"Cyril B." <cbay@...aysdata.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch: Cleanup page permission changes
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 10:18:29AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> > It's probably a good idea to keep the patches bisectable, so I made this
> > a separate patch which applies on top of the first one.
> >
> > (Note that it completely removes all the code from the first patch, so
> > there's no need for a v2 of the first patch which would have had
> > Miroslav's suggested style changes.)
>
> I like this patch and it's something I'd like to queue for 4.4, but given
> the fact that the original "[PATCH] x86/livepatch: Fix crash with
> !CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX" wasn't queued in any tree yet, I don't
> think that sending it as a followup patch is of any use.
>
> So if you agree, I'll just fold the two patches together and use the
> changelog below, and queue it for merge with Linus.
I kept them separate because the first patch is a low risk bug fix, and
the second is a slightly higher risk cleanup.
Would it make sense to put the first one into 4.4 and queue the second
one for 4.5?
--
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists