[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASkXUb-S-MzmaA6KxJbnAPKnLbYvH8KtHPb=fzUrPK2ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:32:15 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] spi: sunxi: remove redundant "depends on RESET_CONTROLLER"
2015-11-05 21:20 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 09:11:47PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2015-11-05 20:28 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>:
>
>> > The dependency is on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST which is not the same as
>> > ARCH_SUNXI.
>
>> The compile test of this driver should pass even if RESET_CONTROLLER
>> is not defined.
>> So, it does not matter for COMPILE_TEST.
>
> If that is the case then the change here is that the dependency on
> RESET_CONTROLLER is just redundant which isn't what the commit message
> says.
For compile test, right, "depends on RESET_CONTROLLER" is
redundant in the first place.
For run-time on real SoCs,the driver failed at the following point
without the reset-controller sub-system.
sspi->rstc = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(sspi->rstc)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't get reset controller\n");
ret = PTR_ERR(sspi->rstc);
goto err_free_master;
}
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists