[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151109081842.GR18797@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 11:18:42 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: glen lee <glen.lee@...el.com>
Cc: Punit Vara <punitvara@...il.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
chris.park@...el.com, austin.shin@...el.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
johnny.kim@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tony.cho@...el.com, leo.kim@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Staging: wilc1000: Fix build break due to undeclared
*wilc and implicit declaration of init_irq
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:02:48PM +0900, glen lee wrote:
> Hi Punit Vara,
>
> I cannot find build errors on my build machines.
>
> According the log which you have posted before says *wilc is undeclared in the function init_wilc_driver,
> which means WILC_SPI is selected because one of SPI or SDIO should be chosen at the moment.
> Hence, struct wilc *wilc should be compiled together.
> It looks like wilc1000 is compiled without SPI or SDIO.
>
> Of course, there are many cases that I don't know, so you could let me know the wilc1000 build configuration?
>
> static int __init init_wilc_driver(void)
> {
> #ifdef WILC_SPI
This should be #ifndef WILC_SDIO
> struct wilc *wilc;
> #endif
But the large question remains of why do we have this variable here any
way?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists