linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] Staging: wilc1000: Fix build break due to undeclared *wilc and implicit declaration of init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABXAfNKVB1X6zj+XD1rwTuFqFzcgfoXFRRb-F66yHBjcAfVCOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:21:19 +0530
From:	punit vara <punitvara@...il.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	glen lee <glen.lee@...el.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	chris.park@...el.com, Austin Shin <austin.shin@...el.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, johnny.kim@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony.cho@...el.com, leo.kim@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Staging: wilc1000: Fix build break due to undeclared
 *wilc and implicit declaration of init_irq

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:02:48PM +0900, glen lee wrote:
>> Hi Punit Vara,
>>
>> I cannot find build errors on my build machines.
>>
>> According the log which you have posted before says *wilc is undeclared in the function init_wilc_driver,
>> which means WILC_SPI is selected because one of SPI or SDIO should be chosen at the moment.
>> Hence, struct wilc *wilc should be compiled together.
>> It looks like wilc1000 is compiled without SPI or SDIO.
>>
>> Of course, there are many cases that I don't know, so you could let me know the wilc1000 build configuration?
>>
>> static int __init init_wilc_driver(void)
>> {
>> #ifdef WILC_SPI
>
> This should be #ifndef WILC_SDIO
>
>
>>       struct wilc *wilc;
>> #endif
>
> But the large question remains of why do we have this variable here any
> way?
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
I do not know why it is there .that is why I did not touch it first
my proposed patch was like
#if (defined WILC_SPI) || (!defined WILC_SDIO)
struct wilc *wilc;
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/