linux-kernel - Re: kdbus refactoring?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151109091430.GE7520@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:14:30 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
	Havoc Pennington <havoc.pennington@...il.com>
Subject: Re: kdbus refactoring?

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:56:04AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:

> The submission and following year of development followed the 'kernel
> way'.

This is not true; the last complete posting I could find was:

  Date: Mon,  9 Mar 2015 14:09:06 +0100
  Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add kdbus implementation

I've seen many random kdbus patches, but not a single comprehensive
posting one could attempt to review after that.

The normal way is to regularly post a complete set of patches for
review -- which very much includes folding patches you get back into the
series, not post a 100+ patch series.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/