[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZN-iwdR_VwktdHsw+rGQLhCgmWnERYVDE+KaYOqJR30w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 11:09:54 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Kapil Hali <kapilh@...adcom.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 3/4] ARM: BCM: Add SMP support for Broadcom NSP
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Kapil Hali <kapilh@...adcom.com> wrote:
> Add SMP support for Broadcom's Northstar Plus SoC
> cpu enable method. This changes also consolidates
> iProc family's - BCM NSP and BCM Kona, platform
> SMP handling in a common file.
>
> Northstar Plus SoC is based on ARM Cortex-A9
> revision r3p0 which requires configuration for ARM
> Errata 764369 for SMP. This change adds the needed
> configuration option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kapil Hali <kapilh@...adcom.com>
This version looks saner to me.
> +static int nsp_write_lut(void)
> +{
> + void __iomem *sku_rom_lut;
> + phys_addr_t secondary_startup_phy;
> +
> + if (!secondary_boot) {
> + pr_warn("required secondary boot register not specified\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + sku_rom_lut = ioremap_nocache((phys_addr_t)secondary_boot,
> + sizeof(secondary_boot));
Why is this address not just taken directly from the device tree?
If it is not in the device tree: why?
Also give it a sane name, bcm_sec_boot_address or so.
"secondary_boot" sounds like a function you call to boot
the second core.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists