[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151109105316.GD963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:53:16 +0000
From: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
To: Mark yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce generic probe function for
component based masters.
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:39:25PM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
> On 2015年10月19日 23:07, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >A lot of component based DRM drivers use a variant of the same code
> >as the probe function. They bind the crtc ports in the first iteration
> >and then scan through the child nodes and bind the encoders attached
> >to the remote endpoints. Factor the common code into a separate
> >function called drm_of_component_probe() in order to increase code
> >reuse.
> >
> >Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
> >Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
> >---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/drm/drm_of.h | 13 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> >index be38840..493c05c 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> >@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> >+#include <linux/component.h>
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > #include <linux/of_graph.h>
> >@@ -61,3 +62,90 @@ uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev,
> > return possible_crtcs;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_of_find_possible_crtcs);
> >+
> >+/**
> >+ * drm_of_component_probe - Generic probe function for a component based master
> >+ * @dev: master device containing the OF node
> >+ * @compare_of: compare function used for matching components
> >+ * @master_ops: component master ops to be used
> >+ *
> >+ * Parse the platform device OF node and bind all the components associated
> >+ * with the master. Interface ports are added before the encoders in order to
> >+ * satisfy their .bind requirements
> >+ * See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt for the bindings.
> >+ *
> >+ * Returns zero if successful, or one of the standard error codes if it fails.
> >+ */
> >+int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
> >+ int (*compare_of)(struct device *, void *),
> >+ const struct component_master_ops *m_ops)
> >+{
> >+ struct device_node *ep, *port, *remote;
> >+ struct component_match *match = NULL;
> >+ int i;
> >+
> >+ if (!dev->of_node)
> >+ return -EINVAL;
> >+
> >+ /*
> >+ * Bind the crtc's ports first, so that drm_of_find_possible_crtcs()
> >+ * called from encoder's .bind callbacks works as expected
> >+ */
> >+ for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> >+ port = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "ports", i);
> >+ if (!port)
> >+ break;
> >+
> >+ if (!of_device_is_available(port->parent)) {
> >+ of_node_put(port);
> >+ continue;
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port);
> Hi Liviu
> Rockchip drm can't work with drm_of_component_probe function now,
>
> At drm_of_component_probe:
> component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port);
> And original rockchip drm use:
> component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port->parent);
>
> That different "port" and "port->parent" cause crtc device node always
> mis-match.
>
> I'm confused that rockchip use same dts node map as imx drm driver, but
> it works
> for imx drm, not work on rockchip drm.
Hi Mark,
I'm (slightly) confused as well. The drivers are different so there must be a reason
to account for the different behaviour. Unfortunately I don't have a Rockchip based
platform ready for testing, so I would appreciate if you could add some debugging
messages to drm_of_component_probe() when component_match_add is being called and
compare that with the version before my patch.
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> >+ of_node_put(port);
> >+ }
> >
> -- Mark Yao
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists