[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151109132914.GK17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:29:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: byungchul.park@....com
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yuyang.du@...el.com, pjt@...gle.com, efault@....de,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] sched: optimize migration by forcing rmb() and
updating to be called once
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 01:16:21AM +0900, byungchul.park@....com wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1264,6 +1264,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_cpus_allowed_ptr);
>
> void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int new_cpu)
> {
> + unsigned int prev_cpu = task_cpu(p);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
> /*
> * We should never call set_task_cpu() on a blocked task,
> @@ -1289,15 +1291,14 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int new_cpu)
> #endif
>
> trace_sched_migrate_task(p, new_cpu);
> + __set_task_cpu(p, new_cpu);
>
> - if (task_cpu(p) != new_cpu) {
> + if (prev_cpu != new_cpu) {
> if (p->sched_class->migrate_task_rq)
> - p->sched_class->migrate_task_rq(p, new_cpu);
> + p->sched_class->migrate_task_rq(p, prev_cpu);
> p->se.nr_migrations++;
> perf_event_task_migrate(p);
> }
> -
> - __set_task_cpu(p, new_cpu);
> }
I don't think this is safe, see the comment in __set_task_cpu(). We want
that to be last.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists