[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151109213109.639071d7@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 21:31:09 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Anvin, H. Peter" <hpa@...or.com>,
lttng-dev <lttng-dev@...ts.lttng.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:51:25 -0800
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> do_syscall_32_irqs_on would call syscall_return_slowpath(regs,
> AUDIT_ARCH_I386). do_syscall_64 (which doesn't exist yet) would call
> syscall_return_slowpath(regs, AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64).
>
OK, so you are saying that a execve that switches the current state
into ia32 will return from the do_syscall_64 regardless? Then we would
have to add tracepoints that would be for both ia32 and x86_64. But
that would solve the current issue at hand.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists