lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151109213109.639071d7@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 2015 21:31:09 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Anvin, H. Peter" <hpa@...or.com>,
	lttng-dev <lttng-dev@...ts.lttng.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue

On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:51:25 -0800
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:


> do_syscall_32_irqs_on would call syscall_return_slowpath(regs,
> AUDIT_ARCH_I386).  do_syscall_64 (which doesn't exist yet) would call
> syscall_return_slowpath(regs, AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64).
> 

OK, so you are saying that a execve that switches the current state
into ia32 will return from the do_syscall_64 regardless? Then we would
have to add tracepoints that would be for both ia32 and x86_64. But
that would solve the current issue at hand.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ