lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151110073647.GB8526@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:36:47 +0100
From:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To:	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regulator: build warning in regulator_lock_supply()

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:21:48PM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> In the current Linus tree, new build warning.
> 
> When CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is not enabled,
> 
>   drivers/regulator/core.c: In function 'regulator_lock_supply':
>   drivers/regulator/core.c:142:6: warning: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable]
> 
> 
> Introduced by commit
> 
>   9f01cd4a915e1 ("regulator: core: introduce function to lock regulators and its supplies")

We could fix this with the following patch. On the other hand I'd say
that it's not our fault that mutex_lock_nested() doesn't use the
variable, so maybe it should rather be a static inline function instead
of a define?

Sascha

---------------------------------8<-------------------------------

>From cacf0a5ae54b5255dfd895d32e74611c6cbeee3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:32:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Fix unused variable warning

When CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is not enabled, we get:
  drivers/regulator/core.c: In function 'regulator_lock_supply':
  drivers/regulator/core.c:142:6: warning: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable]

Fix this by adding a __maybe_unused annotation.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 73b7683..2453bce 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static bool have_full_constraints(void)
 static void regulator_lock_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
 	struct regulator *supply;
-	int i = 0;
+	int __maybe_unused i = 0;
 
 	while (1) {
 		mutex_lock_nested(&rdev->mutex, i++);
-- 
2.6.1


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ