[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1447115762-19734-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:36:00 +0900
From: <byungchul.park@....com>
To: <mingo@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, efault@....de, tglx@...utronix.de,
fweisbec@...il.com, Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/2] sched: consider missed ticks when updating cpu load
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
change from v4 to v5
- fix comments and commit message
- take new_load into account in update_cpu_load_nohz() and __update_cpu_load()
because it's non-zero in NOHZ_FULL
change from v3 to v4
- focus the problem on full NOHZ
change from v2 to v3
- add a patch which make __update_cpu_load() handle active tickless
change from v1 to v2
- add some additional commit message (logic is same exactly)
additionally i tried to use the return value of hrtimer_forward() instead of
jiffies to get pending tick for updating cpu load. it's easy for
update_cpu_load_nohz() to do that. but for update_idle_cpu_load(), i need
more time to think about how to implement it nicely.
and i will try to fix other stuffs caused by full NOHZ later with another
patch. i decided to send this patch at first because "cpu load update" is a
standalone problem which is not coupled with other stuffs.
Byungchul Park (2):
sched: make __update_cpu_load() handle NOHZ_FULL tickless
sched: make update_cpu_load_nohz() consider missed ticks in NOHZ_FULL
include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++--
kernel/sched/fair.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 8 +++----
3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists