[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511101429100.5676@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:34:13 +0000
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<john.stultz@...aro.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] timekeeping: introduce __current_kernel_time64
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:57:49AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > __current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the
> > xtime lock. Mirrors __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time.
>
> It always helps if you include a reason why you want a patch.
You are right, sorry.
I need to get the current_kernel_time from a pvclock_gtod callback
function, which cannot take the lock again.
On x86 we are just calling __current_kernel_time() (see
arch/x86/xen/time.c:xen_pvclock_gtod_notify). I was introducing the same
functionality on ARM, when the maintainers pointed out that it might be
better to use struct timespec64 and related functions for
future-proofness. To do that I need a version of __current_kernel_time
which returns a struct timespec64.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists