linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v10 6/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow limited lock stealing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151110210706.GI17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:07:06 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v10 6/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow
 limited lock stealing

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:46:43PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> That is certainly fine. I was doing that originally, but then change it to
> add an additional if.
> 
> BTW, I have a process question. Should I just resend the patch 6 or should I
> resend the whole series? I do have a couple of bugs in the (_Q_PENDING_BITS
> != 8) part of the patch that I need to fix too.

Just the one patch is fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/