linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:12:37 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
	jlbec@...lplan.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, lars@...afoo.de, knaack.h@....de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, octavian.purdila@...el.com,
	pebolle@...cali.nl, patrick.porlan@...el.com,
	adriana.reus@...el.com, constantin.musca@...el.com,
	marten@...uitiveaerial.com, cristina.opriceana@...il.com,
	pmeerw@...erw.net, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:

> is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus
> for this merge window?  I would make my life easier to have it in
> so I could start using it in patches for various trees in the next
> merge window.

It's super late, but the configfs changes are obviously safe to
existing code.

What about the IIO changes?  Will someone be merging them for 4.5-rc1,
or something else?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/