[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1447192023.25407.0.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 08:47:03 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"frowand.list@...il.com" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...abs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"mitchelh@...eaurora.org" <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Print rather than WARN'ing when overlap check fails
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 09:41 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Michael Ellerman
> > Sent: 10 November 2015 05:09
> > __rmem_check_for_overlap() is called very early in boot, and on some
> > powerpc systems it's not safe to call WARN that early in boot.
> >
> > If the overlap check fails the system will oops instead of printing a
> > warning. Furthermore because it's so early in boot the console is not up
> > and the user doesn't see the oops, they just get a dead system.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to add the required checks to WARN()?
Yes obviously it would. But that's less simple than it sounds. I'm working on
it.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists