[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151112123521.GJ11639@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:35:21 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: ralf@...ux-mips.org, ddaney@...iumnetworks.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, boqun.feng@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock()
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:31:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> unsigned int serving_now = lock->h.serving_now + 1;
> - wmb();
> + smp_mb();
> lock->h.serving_now = (u16)serving_now;
Also, you might want to consider using WRITE_ONCE() for that store.
> nudge_writes();
And that thing is creative, I've not seen any other arch issues barriers
to speed up the store buffer flush. Does it really matter for MIPS?
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists