[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151113173303.GB13490@amt.cnet>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:33:04 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Yu Fenghua <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ioctl based CAT interface
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:51:00PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:39:33PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > + * * one tcrid entry can be in different locations
> > + * in different sockets.
>
> NAK on that without cpuset integration.
>
> I do not want freely migratable tasks having radically different
> performance profiles depending on which CPU they land.
Ok, so, configuration:
Socket-1 Socket-2
pinned thread-A with 100% L3 free
80% of L3
reserved
So it is a problem if a thread running on socket-2 is scheduled to
socket-1 because performance is radically different, fine.
Then one way to avoid that is to not allow freely migratable tasks
to move to Socket-1. Fine.
Then you want to use cpusets for that.
Can you fill in the blanks what is missing here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists