[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151113174300.GA14726@amt.cnet>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:43:02 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Yu Fenghua <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ioctl based CAT interface
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 03:27:40PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:51:00PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:39:33PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > + * * one tcrid entry can be in different locations
> > > + * in different sockets.
> >
> > NAK on that without cpuset integration.
> >
> > I do not want freely migratable tasks having radically different
> > performance profiles depending on which CPU they land.
>
> Please expand on what "cpuset integration" means, operationally.
> I hope it does not mean "i prefer cgroups as an interface",
> because that does not mean much to me.
>
> So you are saying this should be based on cgroups? Have you seen the
> cgroups proposal and the issues with it, that have been posted?
Subject: cat cgroup interface proposal (non hierarchical) was Re: [PATCH
V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache
Allocation Technology Support
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/2/700
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists