[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151114070200.GA27738@lst.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 08:02:00 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@....mellanox.co.il>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>, axboe@...com,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] move blk_iopoll to limit and make it generally
available
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:23:39PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> > The new name is irq_poll as iopoll is already taken. Better suggestions
> > welcome.
>
> Sagi (or Christoph if you can address that),
>
> @ some pointer over the last 18 months there was a port done at
> mellanox for iser to use blk-iopoll and AFAIR it didn't work well or
> didn't work at all. Can you tell now what was the problem and how did
> you address it at your generalization?
Hi Or,
Sagi mentioned last time he tried a similar approach in iSER he saw
some large latency sparks. We've seen nothing worse than the original
approach. The Flash memory summit slide set has some numbers:
http://www.flashmemorysummit.com/English/Collaterals/Proceedings/2015/20150811_FA11_Bandic.pdf
they aren't quite up to date, but the latency distribution hasn't
really changed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists