[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5649AE81.6070809@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:22:57 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky.perez-gonzalez@...el.com>,
linux-wimax@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] WiMAX-i2400m: Delete an unnecessary check before the function
call "kfree_skb"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:17:55 +0100
The kfree_skb() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c
index 4c41790..4de22b7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/control.c
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ void i2400m_msg_to_dev_cancel_wait(struct i2400m *i2400m, int code)
spin_lock_irqsave(&i2400m->rx_lock, flags);
ack_skb = i2400m->ack_skb;
- if (ack_skb && !IS_ERR(ack_skb))
+ if (!IS_ERR(ack_skb))
kfree_skb(ack_skb);
i2400m->ack_skb = ERR_PTR(code);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2400m->rx_lock, flags);
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists