[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4654010.UfKTsDKyes@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:01:36 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init
On Tuesday 17 November 2015 10:57:48 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
> >> it up (at least for the time being).
> >
> > Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?
>
> Sure.
>
> As for the patch I think everything can be converted to init/initdata
> (as in attachment).
>
I don't think so:
static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls169344_interface __initdata = {
.name = "s3c2442_plls169344",
.subsys = &s3c2442_subsys,
.add_dev = s3c2440_plls169344_add,
};
This gets passed into subsys_interface_register(), which is not __init
in turn. subsys_interface_register() then goes on to add
s3c2442_plls169344_interface into a linked list that is traversed
at runtime, but the __initdata section gets discarded so you now
have a broken list.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists