[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151117122022.GE22729@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:20:22 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, lizefan@...wei.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, pi3orama@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] perf test: Test BPF prologue
Em Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:38:37PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> On 2015/11/17 9:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >How about:
> >
> > # perf test -v BPF
> > 37: Test BPF filter:
> > 37.1: test a : Ok
> > 37.2: test b : Ok
> > 37.3: Test BPF prologue generation : Ok
> > 37.4: Another... : Ok
> > 37: Test BPF filter : Ok
> > #
> I think what you want is to report state of subtests *without* -v?
> That would be nice but changing of perf testing infrastructure is required
> because there's no "sub-test" before, and we both agree that testcase
> should be silent without '-v', so we need a way to output them in
> builtin-test.c.
> Let me try it but I think it should not be a blocking problem.
Thanks for looking into this,
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists