[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151117021856.GB5867@yaowei-K42JY>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:18:56 +0800
From: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhe@...hat.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
dave@...olabs.net, dhowells@...hat.com, dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com, holt@....com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, joe@...ches.com, kuleshovmail@...il.com,
mgorman@...e.de, mhocko@...e.cz, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, penberg@...nel.org,
sasha.levin@...cle.com, tj@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, vdavydov@...allels.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] mm/vmscan: page_is_file_cache can be boolean
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:10:10AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Yaowei Bai wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm_inline.h b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
> > index cf55945..af73135 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm_inline.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
> > @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
> > * page_is_file_cache - should the page be on a file LRU or anon LRU?
> > * @page: the page to test
> > *
> > - * Returns 1 if @page is page cache page backed by a regular filesystem,
> > - * or 0 if @page is anonymous, tmpfs or otherwise ram or swap backed.
> > + * Returns true if @page is page cache page backed by a regular filesystem,
> > + * or false if @page is anonymous, tmpfs or otherwise ram or swap backed.
> > * Used by functions that manipulate the LRU lists, to sort a page
> > * onto the right LRU list.
> > *
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> > * needs to survive until the page is last deleted from the LRU, which
> > * could be as far down as __page_cache_release.
> > */
> > -static inline int page_is_file_cache(struct page *page)
> > +static inline bool page_is_file_cache(struct page *page)
> > {
> > return !PageSwapBacked(page);
> > }
>
> Since page_is_file_cache() is often used to determine which zlc to
> increment or decrement (usage such as
> NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_is_file_cache(page)), I don't think this style is
> helpful.
Yes, you'r right, we can drop this one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists