[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2673022.mRz1O5OCy7@sifl>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:53:55 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel-audit: Delete unnecessary checks before two function calls
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 12:42:52 PM SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:38:33 +0100
>
> The functions consume_skb() and kfree_skb() test whether their argument
> is NULL and then return immediately.
> Thus the tests around their calls are not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> kernel/audit.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Merged, thanks.
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 5ffcbd3..1e8e228 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -509,8 +509,7 @@ static void flush_hold_queue(void)
> * if auditd just disappeared but we
> * dequeued an skb we need to drop ref
> */
> - if (skb)
> - consume_skb(skb);
> + consume_skb(skb);
> }
>
> static int kauditd_thread(void *dummy)
> @@ -1232,9 +1231,7 @@ static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> if (!ab)
> return;
>
> - if (ab->skb)
> - kfree_skb(ab->skb);
> -
> + kfree_skb(ab->skb);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&audit_freelist_lock, flags);
> if (audit_freelist_count > AUDIT_MAXFREE)
> kfree(ab);
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists