linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 4/8] Input: goodix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKdAkRSdWQwkpKBNohQT2QhgBM0gxqVxLniViM5TrBNUoqZ1sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:31:07 -0800
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:	Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@...el.com>,
	Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
	Aleksei Mamlin <mamlinav@...il.com>,
	Karsten Merker <merker@...ian.org>,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/8] Input: goodix - add power management support

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 02:26:37PM +0200, Irina Tirdea wrote:
>>> Implement suspend/resume for goodix driver.
>>>
>
> [cut]
>
>>>
>>> +static int __maybe_unused goodix_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>>> +     struct goodix_ts_data *ts = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>>> +     int error;
>>> +
>>> +     /* We need gpio pins to suspend/resume */
>>> +     if (!ts->gpiod_int || !ts->gpiod_rst)
>>> +             return 0;
>>> +
>>> +     wait_for_completion(&ts->firmware_loading_complete);
>>
>> This is not that nice as it may lead to angry splats from the PM core if
>> firmware loading takes too long and we start suspending before it
>> completes.
>
> What exactly do you mean?  The suspend watchdog or something else?

I was thinking about dpm watchdog that will panic the system if
suspend takes too long. Hmm, this is debug facility and the default
timeout is 60 seconds, so I guess we can ignore my concern.

>
>> Rafael, if we issue pm_stay_awake() before requesting firmware and
>> pm_relax() once it is done, will this prevent the current suspend
>> timeouts?
>
> pm_stay_awake() only works if the checking of wakeup sources is
> enabled which generally depends on what user space does.

I see.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/