[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201511201016.26302.linux@rainbow-software.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:16:25 +0100
From: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Sam Creasey <sammy@...my.net>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/71] More fixes, cleanup and modernization for NCR5380 drivers
On Friday 20 November 2015, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:21:06PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> >
> > > > Not sure what module was being probed here. I presume it was
> > > > g_NCR5380 or g_NCR5380_mmio. Neither of these calls
> > > > 'scsi_scan_host'. I'm not sure what the implications are (?)
> > >
> > > Nevermind. The call is in scsi_module.c.
> >
> > Which, btw really need to go away. If you want to resurrect the
> > ISA drivers they need to be converted to proper probing.
>
> Yes. I didn't do that conversion because I don't have ISA hardware and I
> don't understand ISA probing.
>
> The present patch set doesn't seek to resurrect the ISA drivers. But I am
> trying to avoid regressions.
>
> I have mixed feelings about the ISA drivers. ISA DMA support complicates
> things (it was never completed) and DMA seems to be the main obstacle to
> merging the two core driver forks.
IIRC, my ISA cards can't do DMA either.
--
Ondrej Zary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists